Marietta-Roswell Alumnae Chapter
2016 Election: NO PROTECTION!
1965 Voting Rights Act
Shelby County v Holder
On June 25, 2013, The Supreme Court of the United States held that it is unconstitutional to use the coverage formula of the VRA to determine which jurisdictions were subject to the pre-clearance requirement of Section 5. The jurisdictions identified by the coverage formula , no longer need to seek pre-clearance for new voting changes. This means the previous safeguards that were in place to ensure voter disenfranchisement did not occur in the identified covered jurisdictions/states can be stripped away.
What can you do?
“2016 Election: NO PROTECTION!”
Job Listings and Local Owned Businesses
- Oracle Application Financial Business Analyst10 Sep 2015
Responsibilities: The Oracle Financials Functional Analyst will join the Financial Information Systems Team in providing functional/technical support for Oracle E-Business Suite enhancements and syste...